1/31/2024 0 Comments F18 carrier landing on pc![]() Second, he advised that I use the Link-4A system, or ACLS (Automatic Landing System). Fly your approach always just a little fast. It will want to take you high and so push it down gently with the stick. One, keep power always on the aircraft if it is the A7. One of my squadron mates was always in the top 8 in grades for landing on the ship. Now the LSO is not encouraging you anymore, but screaming "Wave off! Wave off!." So better not to be here. The ball has been red for quite a while, and possibly disappeared off the OLS. The engine takes seconds to spool up as you are sinking lower. The LSO knows all this and so is encouraging you to keep the power on, but then you hit the burble behind the deck and drop out of the sky, most probably when you are coming on with military power. Your correction will be too great, and then you find yourself low and slow, with no power on the aircraft. Your only option at that point, if you haven't been waved off, is to make a big correction by coming back on the throttle. You never wanted to find yourself in close, high, with too much power. ![]() The A7-E was difficult to land because of its turbofan jet engine. I flew aboard the USS Nimitz in the mid-1980's in the A7-E corsair. And in a combat situation, do you want to rely on systems that could be jammed or failed? If you are going to land the plane without a pilot, you might as well not have the pilot at all, and this is the route that future unmanned systems are taking, but there is a lot more work to be done before they completely replace human pilots. If the system requires addition to the carrier as well, there is more added expense. Adding them would create extra expense and weight. The sensors and processing that the UAV uses to do this are probably not all standard equipment on naval aircraft. The team behind the X-47B was awarded the Collier Trophy for the advances in aeronautics they achieved. A lot of sensing and control must be worked out. Although a computerized system is theoretically more capable of performing precise carrier landings, the details are complex. However, the system has not always been reliable and still has its limits, and other reasons for not always using this system are similar to those for land-based aircraft.įurther reasons for this technology not being more fully developed yet are probably similar to this question.Ī completely automated, unmanned landing on a carrier has been done, but only fairly recently. The Navy does have systems that are capable of guiding an airplane in for a landing, and some aircraft can use this system to land completely on the autopilot. Plus, its just plain eerie letting the jet fly itself to the boat, and the current system isn't reliable enough that most guys would feel comfortable letting it fly itself on a regular basis.Įdit: Heck, new guys aren't even allowed to perform auto approaches (auto throttle) to the boat for the same reason. As often as possible, we prepare for the 1 percentile, not the 99th percentile, so when we do get that engine fire at night we get the upgrade OK, and not the cut pass/ ejection. If our fictional JO wasn't proficient hand flying the ball behind the boat this could result in catastrophic consequences including both the loss of aircrew and aircraft. Murphy's Law tells us that the most junior guy, with the least experience behind the boat, is going to get an engine fire, at night, in rough seas. However, the most compelling reason to hand fly all our approaches is that we fly a $60 million jet. Gross deviations in glide path resulting from a pitching deck would make a coupled approach impractical. ![]() However, there are limits to the sea state. Why isn't it handled (yet) by a computer? Are there projects of implementing such system?Ĭomputers can, in fact, control the approach of a Super Hornet all the way to touchdown. Or be presented as a subsystem within the carrier which sends the encrypted information to the authenticated aircraft about the exact position of given points of the carrier and a second subsystem inside the aircraft which relies on this information to make the controlled landing. ![]() The fact that there should be no enemy aircraft nearby also means that the initiative of a pilot is not needed.Įither be exclusively inside the aircraft (doing image recognition of a carrier and trying to determine where to land not sure how easy and reliable this can get), A machine can take in account exactly the motion of the carrier and other parameters and land the aircraft precisely where it should. It seems exactly like a problem which can better be performed by a computer rather than a human being. Landing on a carrier seems like a difficult and risky task for military pilots, especially at night when the carrier should keep low profile and is practically unlit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |